Legal forms · Ethical entrepreneurship
Partnerships vs corporations: what's the difference and why does it matter?
When starting a business, one of the first and most important questions is the choice of legal form. Although the differences seem purely administrative, they fundamentally determine who makes decisions, who is liable for debts, and the very purpose of the organisation.
01 · Starting point
More than an administrative detail
Under Croatian law (the Companies Act), the basic distinction is between partnerships (companies of persons) and capital companies. The difference is not a mere technicality - it defines the power dynamics within the organisation.
The legal form you choose determines whether your business rests on interpersonal trust or on the size of the stake, whether members manage directly or hire professional management, and whether the primary goal is mutual benefit or profit maximisation for investors.
Partnerships
The individual comes first
In partnerships, the personal connection between members is key. Main forms in Croatia are <strong>general partnership (j.t.d.)</strong> and <strong>limited partnership (k.d.)</strong>. Members typically have unlimited personal liability for the partnership's debts, run the business themselves, and admitting a new member requires the consent of others - because personal identity is considered essential to the partnership's survival.
Capital companies
The stake comes first
In capital companies, who you are doesn't matter - only how much you've invested. Main forms are <strong>limited liability company (d.o.o.)</strong>, <strong>simple LLC (j.d.o.o.)</strong> and <strong>joint-stock company (d.d.)</strong>. Owners are not liable with personal assets - risk is limited to the value of the stake. Ownership is separated from management, and shares are more easily transferable.
02 · Comparison
Key differences at a glance
Five dimensions where legal form translates into real differences in everyday operations:
01Basis of association
Partnerships: personal qualities of members and mutual trust. Capital companies: the amount of capital contributed - members may not even know each other.
02Liability for debts
Partnerships: members are liable with all of their personal assets - unlimited. Capital companies: the company is liable with its own assets; member risk is limited to the value of their stake.
03Management
Partnerships: members directly manage the business. Capital companies: the General Assembly elects a Board (directors) that runs the business - ownership is separated from management.
04Transfer of shares
Partnerships: difficult - consent of all other members is required. Capital companies: easier - sale of shares is usually free or subject to formal rules.
05Minimum capital
Partnerships: not prescribed by law. Capital companies: legally defined - e.g. €2,500 for a d.o.o., more for a joint-stock company.
03 · And where does the cooperative fit?
The cooperative: a partnership <em>par excellence</em>
Although often grouped with commercial companies, the cooperative is a specific form that combines elements of both worlds, but with a clear focus on people. By its very nature, the cooperative is a partnership in its purest form.
Unlike capital companies where decision-making power depends on the number of shares purchased, in a cooperative a fundamental democratic rule applies that changes everything. In capital companies the primary goal is profit maximisation for investors - in cooperatives the goal is to meet shared member needs, sustainability and social benefit.
1 member = 1 vote
In a joint-stock company: 1 share = 1 vote. In a cooperative: one member, one vote - regardless of stake size. This ensures that capital never becomes more important than people.
04 · What to choose?
Legal form follows purpose
There is no „best" form - there is the form that best matches your purpose. Three typical scenarios:
Small craft business with a partner
If you're planning a small venture with a partner you trust unconditionally and don't need significant starting capital, a partnership (j.t.d. or k.d.) offers simplicity - but with high personal liability for all debts.
Asset protection and growth
If you want to protect personal assets and plan growth that requires investment, the d.o.o. is the standard path. Risk is limited, it's easier to attract outside capital, and ownership can be transferred.
Democratic governance and community
If your goal is democratic governance, solidarity and joint work on solving social problems, the cooperative is the only form that guarantees capital never becomes more important than people.
Form shapes purpose
Legal form is not a neutral shell. It carries within it an assumption about what matters - people or capital. Understanding the difference between partnerships, capital companies and cooperatives means understanding what kind of world you're building with your organisation.
Keep exploring
Each of these frameworks lights up a different side of the same question: how can finance and organising serve people and nature instead of the other way around?
Impact measurement · SDPI & ECG
Measuring the common good: beyond ESG
How to measure success when profit is not the goal - an adaptation of UNRISD's Sustainable Development Performance Indicators (SDPI) and the Common Good Matrix (ECG) for ethical finance, cooperative economics and climate justice.
ReadKey topic · Regenerative economy
Regenerative economy: an economy that restores
The umbrella framework that ties all other resources together - how to move from an extractive to a regenerative economy through 5 key sectors: regenerative agriculture, community energy, circular production, social economy and regenerative finance.
ReadMonetary theory · Endogenous money
Endogenous money: how loans create deposits
A practical adaptation of post-Keynesian monetary theory for ZEF and the European Ethical Bank - why banks do not lend out 'other people's savings' but create money the moment they approve a loan, and what that means for ethical finance.
ReadOn this page